Category Archives: Revenue & Expenses

Swimming Pool Design and Flexibility of Utilization

The following presentation was presented at the FINA World Aquatics Convention held in Moscow Russia on October 31, 2012

What is the definition of Success for a Swimming Pool?  It may depend on who you ask.

For the Athlete it may be to create an environment that allows them to do their lifetime best.  This may be influenced by awe of arriving on the world stage in a magnificent venue or the mental preparation available in the adjacent space.  In the end the field of play allows them the ability to not only compete against todays competitors but the legacy of past champions.

For the Spectator a great view and comfortable experience is required to generate repeated visits and a memorable games.  This goes beyond the pool envelop and encompasses the arrival and departure way finding, support facilities that may include security, ticket control, concourses, and support spaces.

For the Official they share many of the same needs as the athlete and spectator regarding the venue space, however, they require unique spaces to perform at their best.

Media also has unique requirements for a successful venue.  Different media outlets have different physical requirements to be able to deliver the competition to its audience.  In the end, the audience wants to participate as a valued member of the venue with seamless incorporation to viewing the competition and the visual experience.

The Sponsor / Partner is also a critical component of a successful event and the design solution must incorporate their wants and needs as well.  These needs result in a wow experience with a sense of being special and being able to provide a memorable experience to their guests.

A successful facility goes beyond the competitive event.  The facility manager and operators will also have their own definitions of success.  They are looking for a design solution that provides dependable reliable service during the meet but also during everyday activities.

Lastly meeting the definitions of success for the community or host of the facility is critical to the creation and operation of the aquatic venue.  These stakeholders don’t measure success in a week long meet but over generations of use.  The operations must be fiscally, programmatically, and economically sustainable.  The definition of success might go beyond the facility and look at the economic impact to the local economy or is presence on the world stage.

 

So How Do You Get All Of These Different Stakeholders With Different Definitions of Success On The Same Page?

 

The key is accurate and timely information to make knowledgeable decisions on how to move forward.  This starts at the idea phase and continues on even after the facility is open and operating.

Idea Stage:  Visioning, dreaming and goal setting are important to explore every possibility.  As more information becomes available these aspirations will begin to align with reality.  For example, is it your goal to be a world class venue facility or a world class training facility to develop the best athletes in the world to compete at the best venue facilities?

Business Plan:  As reality starts to take shape it is not uncommon to develop multiple scenarios.  The basic information that needs to be gathered during the planning process is who is going to use it, how are they going to use it and when they are going to use it.  For example in the United States when we sit down with a variety of stakeholders that may include with multiple swim teams.  When asked when they want to use the pool –  everyone wants the pool after school.  So from a capacity point of view we would need 4 – 50 meter pools that would be at capacity from 3PM to 6PM but sit practically empty the rest of the day.  So getting the various groups talking together about a common definition of success is helpful in transforming the vision into a reality.

As the vision starts to take shape it is not uncommon to have multiple options.  These might include a Dream concept (which makes everyone happy except the person paying for the facility), reality concept (that most closely meets global requirements of the stakeholders) and a fall back concept (which maybe the least you are willing to support and still move forward with the project).  For each concept a space program is developed with preliminary development costs and operational analysis.  This process answers the how, what and when questions, and then outlines the financial requirements for creating the spaces and the requirements to operate them.  In reality it is often easier getting the development funding than the operating funding as the operations may last a lifetime.

Fiscal sustainability:  Traditionally we have seen three economic models for operating an aquatic facility.  These include the subsidy model, break even model and positive cash flow model.

The subsidy model is where the owner / develop is willing to use government dollars to build the facility and operate the facility.

The break-even model is where the owner / developer is willing to use government dollars to build the facility but the direct operating costs are paid by the operational revenue of the aquatic center.

The last model is the positive cash-flow model.  This is where the operation revenue is not only expected to pay for the operation costs, but also contribute to the capital costs.

There is a mis-understanding with regard to a venue facility and financial performance.  In North America, the revenue from spectator seating often goes to the sponsoring organization.  The facility is essentially renting space for the event.  The positive economic impact of local businesses does not benefit from recognized revenue for the facility however; it may help the local government that may also own the facility.  Clearly understanding how success will be measured is particularly important when evaluating a spectator oriented facility.

Developing a site specific business plan with all of the information necessary to talk knowledgably with political leadership is a requirement to get the support needed for moving forward.  Once a commitment to move forward is made then the process of delivering the experience can begin.

Delivering the Experience

Athlete – Delivering the sense of Wow.  When walking into the venue facility sense of importance and awe.  Having arrived at the world stage.  The athlete needs a fast pool.  These are the results of resistive forces experience by the competitor during a race and the propulsive forces that a swimmer can generate.  The design can affect both of these.  For the resistive forces, water depth, wave action (gutter design and touch pad design), mechanical system returns can all influence the field of play.  I have often said the definition of a fast pool is a lake a sunset, it is just glass.  The design must return the pool to a glass like state as quickly as possible.

The design also influences propulsive forces.  The water temperature and quality can have a profound impact on the athlete’s performance.  FINA rules are prescriptive on temperature requirements for competition.  The mechanical systems ability to deliver this temperature is critical to maximize the athlete’s performance.

The design must also provide good water and air.  The sanitation process includes chemical reactions that require air.  Minimizing the disinfection byproducts depend on both the water chemistry and the air systems.  Getting the right solution by incorporating water filtration, sanitation with both primary and supplemental sanitation and the air handling system to support the chemical reaction and evacuating the disinfection byproducts is critical to a life time best performance for the athlete.  This receipe of success just does not happen without careful planning and engineering.

Spectators – may not know the details of a great venue facility, but they know when it does not work right.  Lines of site, acoustics, glare, temperature and humidity levels and comfortable seat all significantly impact the spectator experience.  Getting this right is the result of careful planning and design to deliver an outstanding venue environment

Beyond the venue, support facilities such as food service and restrooms are critical to provide comfort to the patron.  The transportation system and parking add to the overall memories of the competition.

Officials also are sensitive to glare, temperature, humidity, lines of site, but they also require unique spaces.  Deck space, clear traffic patterns, and adjacencies are critical.  Dedicated support facility for toilets, changing and hospitality are critical

Media – The design challenges for the media are a balance of providing what is necessary without building in functional obsolescence.  Both technology and the presentation are changing dramatically and the ability to create something today that will support and foster great presentations for the next 50 to 100 years is critical.  Visual excitement is fostered by staging that can include framing the picture with spectators in the background (gladiator seating), visually appealing (un-attractive spaces in critical camera angles) and the use of color.  Staging also incorporate a little theater with exciting athlete entrances and award stand presentations.  Providing the wow shot for those special moments.  A dedicated interview space that is functional and accessible in a timely fashion is critical to catch the excitement of the moment.

Practical infrastructure design to meet the media needs to support the general requirements.  This could include lighting catwalks for rigging, power, access to outside support spaces.  Technology to internet

Corporate Sponsor – expects all the basics of the normal spectator but with a sense of creating a unique experience.  From a design perspective this could take the form of dedicated space that provides proximity to the action, views, hospitality services, security, and ease of ingress and egress.

The facility managers and operations will be looking for design and engineering solutions that offer adequate functional work and storage space to support their requirements.  These are often the first to go when budgets get tight and can have a lasting effect for the life of the facility.  Their goal is to be able to provide and experience that meets and exceeds expectations on a daily basis.  This requires dependable equipment and controls, ease of maintainability (relamping), practical mechanical solutions (UV Maintenance requirements – Time and money), redundancy in systems( pumps, motors, HVAC 1 big unit versus 3 smaller ones) and effective staffing levels.

Different areas of the world have different expectations with regard to staffing and risk management protocols.  For example in many places it may be cheaper to staff of position than to install and automatic control system.  In some cultures staff security through visual control and access is expected while in others having a individual available for questions is common.  Lifeguarding protocols is an example of different operating expectations and labor impact that the same facility can have in different parts of the world.

In the end, the design must be able to deliver a safe and wholesome experience for the users to generate repeat visits both for competitors and daily users.  In summary, patrons do not come to the pool because of the locker room, but they may not come to the pool because of the locker room if it is not clean and safe.

For a venue facility to be successful, the design solution often goes beyond the competitive field of play and incorporates meeting the general aquatic needs of the community.  Typically this not only includes the athlete but also the recreation, lesson and fitness and therapy users.  Each user group has specific needs for their program.  Often these include around water temperature and water depth.  The competitive swimming is an athlete requiring both deep water (2 meter / 3 meters) and cool water (25 to 28 degrees Celsius).  The recreation user may prefer shallower in the 1.2 meter range and warmer water in the 29 to 30 C range.  The lesson swimmer needs staging area or what I call gutter crawler area with open area to swim.  The therapy and fitness user can have a variety of preferences on water temperature depending on the modality and purpose of the protocol.  For example, an arthritis patient might prefer water in the 33 C range and a MS patient would prefer much cooler water.

The more user groups and constituencies that benefit from the creation of an aquatics facility weather for the Olympics, World Championships, World Cup Grand Prix, the  Juniors or the community swim club, the more likely the vision will become a reality.  By expanding, the benefits beyond the athlete to the local community (life skills) and creating an economic engine that is self-sustaining and positively impacts the economy creates a winning scenario for all involved.

 

All Stories

Lifeguarding/Bather Supervision Module Open For Public Comment

The Lifeguarding/Bather Supervision Module for the Model Aquatic Health Code (MAHC) was posted by the CDC on May 31, 2012 for public comment.  With most of the seasonal pools in the United States opening that week, we suspect that many industry professionals may have  missed the posting, including us.  The deadline for public comments is October 14, 2012. Counsilman-Hunsaker strongly encourages everyone in the aquatic community to review and participate in this process.

MAHC Lifeguarding and Bather Supervision Module Abstract

Health and safety issues related to bather supervision and lifeguarding for both the patron and the potential rescuer of an aquatic facility are increasingly being documented. The Lifeguarding and Bather Supervision Module is a first step towards improving the consistency in training, lifeguard management and supervision, lifeguard competency for guarded facilities and proper bather supervision at unguarded facilities. The Lifeguarding and Bather Supervision Module contains requirements for unguarded and guarded aquatics along with the training necessary to be a qualified lifeguard. The module includes:

  1. Standards for which aquatic facilities need to be guarded and which may not need to have professional lifeguard supervision but are still supervised.
  2. An Aquatic Facilities Safety Plan guide including pre-service, in-service, staffing, single lifeguard, lifeguard management and Emergency Action Plan requirements.
  3. Requirements for aquatic facilities to define, diagram, and document required zones of patron surveillance.
  4. Determination of what constitutes proper staffing by the ability of the lifeguard to reach all areas of their zone of patron surveillance within a certain time frame.
  5. Required lifesaving equipment, communications standards, and general requirements for lifeguards and lifeguard supervision/management training.

In addition to the Lifeguarding and Bather Supervision module, an annex section is provides support information to assist users in understanding the background of the provisions.

The Model Aquatic Health Code Steering Committee and Technical Committees appreciate your willingness to comment on the draft MAHC modules. Click here to download comment form.

All public comments will filter back to the Technical Committee for review before the module is officially released.

MAHC Background

The Model Aquatic Health Code (MAHC) effort began in February 2005. The first industry standard was issued in 1958. In the subsequent 50 years, there have been at least 50 different state codes and many independent county codes. What was required in one jurisdiction may be illegal in another. It is clear that this historic approach is not working. Thus, the National Swimming Pool Foundation took a leadership position and provided funding to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) for the creation of the MAHC. The MAHC is intended to transform the patch work of industry codes into a data-driven, knowledge-based, risk reduction effort to prevent disease, injuries and promote healthy water experiences. To view the latest updates regarding the Model Aquatic Health Code go to www.chh2o.com/MAHC

Welch Pool a Hit in Summer Sun

Counsilman – Hunsaker worked with the Centre Region Parks and Recreation Authority for the renovation of the William L. Welch Community Swimming Pool.  That facility was completed in May 2011.  The following article was recently published in the StateCollege News.

 

The William L. Welch Community Swimming Pool complex has been a big splash with the public.

“This is a wonderful community pool,” said Joe Boris, who just finished his 39th year of teaching at State College Area High School. “There’s a group of us here that is just like family. It’s kind of like our social circle.”

This marks the second season for the redeveloped complex on Westerly Parkway, which underwent a $5.2 million makeover prior to a grand reopening in May 2011.

The original pool opened in 1959.

““Even though the weather has been weird, we’ve sold a lot of season passes,” said John Sumereau, who has been a manager at the pool for four years. “There are attractions here that you can’t get anywhere else in the area.

“Some people think it’s a water park at first.”

Complete with two huge water slides, a waterworks area, lap pool, diving boards, whirlpool and a “lazy river,” there is plenty available for both children and adults to enjoy.

The Welch pool also has been a popular meeting place for State College residents — both old and new — through the years.

“It’s great. We all thought it would be awful when they tore it up,” said Cathy Murphy, who has been coming to the pool since 1995.

Murphy’s youngest child, Sam, is now a lifeguard. Aside from the diving boards, his favorite part about the complex is the people.

“They’re mostly friendly and nice,” he said. “Everyone cares about the rules and doesn’t break them.”

Sam was on the swim team at Welch from ages 5-12. The team still practices and holds meets at the pool.

Mehnaz Jehan, of State College, has just begun taking her 7-year-old daughter, Insha, to the pool. She particularly enjoys the winding tube slides. “It’s her favorite part,” Jehan said, chuckling.

Steve and Kari Smith especially like the Welch pool because it’s close to home. The Smiths take their two small children, Lilly and Juliana, to the “toddler time” that the pool offers.

“The older kids come later on and the kids take a nap in the afternoon, so it works out perfect,” Steve said.

Steve’s favorite feature of the pool is the water works area.

“There’s so much to do under two feet,” he says.

General swimming at the Welch pool starts at 1 p.m. on weekdays and noon on weekends. Both sessions end at 8 p.m. daily.

For rates and other information on the Welch pool, as well as its sister pool, Park Forest, you can visit the Centre Region Parks and Recreation website.

Energy Savings = VFD

Most health codes require a minimum frequency for filtering the water (turnover) in a commercial swimming pool and many of these codes also mandate the engineering solution for resistance (total dynamic head – TDH) in these systems.  The TDH assumptions are often conservative resulting in the selected pump being larger than required to move the required amount of water through the system.  As a result, the system is hydraulically throttled down to the required flow rate.  Hydraulically throttled systems result in wasted energy and the wasted energy can be eliminated by incorporating a Variable Frequency Drive.  The payback for a facility that is operating the pump 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, can be measured in months with the resulting savings dropping to the bottom line.  Today, VFD’s are becoming common place with specific adaptation for the aquatic industry that occurred in the last couple of years.   

How Does A VFD Work?

Simplistically a variable frequency drive (VFD) adjusts the amount of power sent to the motor to adjust how fast it spins the impeller resulting in the water being pumped.  As the impeller spins faster or slower a corresponding amount of energy is consumed.  By controlling the speed of the motor based on the actual flow rate of water the VFD is able to maintain optimal water flow as the hydraulic resistance of the system changes based on the loading of the filter.

A more technical description of the VFD interface with electric motors is that a motor-driven system is controlled by the frequency of the supply voltage and rotates on a fixed speed. An alternating current that is applied produces a magnetic field that rotates at synchronous speed. The only way to alternate synchronous speed is through a VFD, which converts the power in three stages. In the rectifier stage, the power is converted to a higher adjustable DC voltage. In the inverter stage, the power transistors in the rectified DC are switched off and on. This produces a voltage waveform at the frequency desired matching the pump load requirements with the energy consumed. From an energy perspective, the power consumed by a pool pump varies by the cube of the change in speed at which it runs – the third affinity law.  Therefore a small reduction in pump motor speed can have a significant impact on the energy consumed.  For example, reducing the pump’s speed by 15% will reduce the energy used by 39%.  To apply this in real dollars, let’s assume a 15 hp motor (typical for an eight lane, 25 yard pool) operating year around in an area of the country with energy costs in the 9.5 cent kilowatt per hour range.  An average 15% reduction in pump operating speed would result in an annual energy savings in the range of $2,700 – $3,100. 

There are other potential applications for VFD technology if the industry can get health department cooperation in maximizing public health in a cost efficient manner.  For example, today’s health codes do not take into account if the pool is occupied or unoccupied with respect turnover requirements.  What if we had the speed of filtration was tied to the water quality?  As water gets dirtier, the filtration rate automatically increases and as the water becomes cleaner, the filtration rate slows thus saving money.  This aligns the filtration solution and operating costs with the actual water quality and does not use an inefficient one size fits all solution.  This in my opinion is where the industry needs to go to provide the best result for the patron, owner and public health. 

I’ve Been Red Crossed

Every month there seems to be another update about the American Red Cross fees.  First the Red Cross changes fees, then everyone complains, and then the Red Cross changes fees, then everyone complains … it’s getting pretty old.

I think everyone (and I mean everyone) needs to get over this.  Yes, I can understand that the Red Cross released their new fees in the worst way possible by dumping it onto everyone in the middle of a budget after lesson fees have been posted.  And yes the Red Cross’s responses to this have been pretty poor (and in my opinion not well thought out), but do you really think they can keep offering the same services priced the way they were in the 90’s?  Haven’t you changed your fees in the past … I don’t know 10 years? Read more »